Post a new comment to participate in the discussion on how this
game should be configured, or to add relevant information regarding
the use of these configurations.
Also remember that the Wikipedia article may list the original developer, which may not be the same as the Amiga developer if the game is a port... -But the solution is simple, if developer is not known, it's not a problem to leave it blank. Information about the publisher is more often known, so this is mostly an issue with "developer".
Well, LemonAmiga says Software Sourcery. It think: if in doubt, just don't add the information. Publisher/developer is nice, but not required. Better to only add information when it is quite certain, to avoid confusion.
I know, on HOL the developer is unknown, but on Wikipedia the developer is named as GameTek/Eurocom... So what you say? It's better we use GameTek? Or Eurocom? Or GameTex & Eurocom?
Excellent
Would one screenshot with a 'flawless victory' do? If so... you see?
Also remember that the Wikipedia article may list the original developer, which may not be the same as the Amiga developer if the game is a port... -But the solution is simple, if developer is not known, it's not a problem to leave it blank. Information about the publisher is more often known, so this is mostly an issue with "developer".
Well, LemonAmiga says Software Sourcery. It think: if in doubt, just don't add the information. Publisher/developer is nice, but not required. Better to only add information when it is quite certain, to avoid confusion.
I know, on HOL the developer is unknown, but on Wikipedia the developer is named as GameTek/Eurocom... So what you say? It's better we use GameTek? Or Eurocom? Or GameTex & Eurocom?
I demand that all screenshots portray FS-UAE as winning
(only joking)
Who wins?
Pay attention to the name of the player1 on screen1.